Why antivirus software is so keen to call us names. It would be nice if we could give some explanation here of We put out a release, they turned round and flagged that one as They withdrew the database entry in question. In several cases, we submitted a false-positive report to ClamAV, and Other than the specific PuTTY executable in question. No way that a database entry of that kind could have matched anything Specifically as malware, apparently on purpose – there is Malware it's that ClamAV's database was identifying PuTTY General behaviour or matching a general pattern that made it look like In other words, it wasn't that PuTTY was exhibiting any kind of Hash of the code segment of the corresponding putty.exe. Of those accusations was based on ClamAV's database containing an MD5 Successive releases of putty.exe to be flagged as various Least able to find the entries in its database that caused four Have caused all those people to flag PuTTY as malware.ĬlamAV is a partial exception: because it's free software, we were at Information we could use, and undoubtedly would say they have sound Of course, we weren't able to investigate most of these claims,īecause proprietary antivirus organisations don't provide much According to nProtect: Backdoor/W32.Swrort.200704.According to TrendMicro: HT_RAZY_GC280119.UVPM., though another report said that upgrading Malwarebytes was also reported to have blocked our download server.According to Rising: Malware.Heuristic!ET#86% (rdm+).According to Yomi Hunter: Trojan.Shelma!6FgIvXQ353M.According to Yandex: Trojan.Rozena!HzkpdhLd3Ls.According to SentinelOne: DFI - Suspicious PE.According to Rising: (RDML:L2kuAr0kZuIw8c+l3U6LAA).According to Antiy-AVL: Trojan/Win32.Swrort.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |